When the Supreme Court threw out the Trump administration's use of a novel emergency tool to implement tariffs Friday, the White House quickly turned to a different novel emergency tool — but economists and lawyers are now questioning its legality as well.

In a 6-3 decision on Friday, the Supreme Court invalidated the majority of President Donald Trump's global tariffs.

As the U.S. Supreme Court rules against Trump's tariffs, farmers and soybean producers have to live with the damage from trade wars.

U.S. Customs and Border Protection said on Monday that it will stop collecting tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act at 05:01 am GMT on Tuesday after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled those duties illegal.

The Supreme Court’s decision eliminated a large number of the Trump Administration’s tariffs, but other tariffs, unrelated to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, remain.

Process matters. Due process, equal protection, gun rights, free speech, freedom of religion, voting rights and all other rights are protected by processes. Those processes include checks and balances and separation of powers relied upon in this Supreme Court decision that protected us from taxation without congressional representation.

The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday invalidated tariffs that President Donald Trump had imposed under the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA).

The Supreme Court has ruled that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act tariffs exceed the executive's authority, and Congress must now take up the task of defining a new tariff agenda that lowers prices,