Latest news and live updates as Trump announces the U.S. will send Patriot missiles to Ukraine and meets with NATO's ...

The employees at USIP are the latest group of mass firings as part of the Trump administration’s broader efforts to shrink ...

Supreme Court declines to hear a case that challenged the scope of certain citizen lawsuits under the Clean Water Act. ● Bureau of Reclamation’s internal watchdog flags fraud and waste risk in drought ...

While the Supreme Court’s conservative supermajority is pushing the law rightward, the justices appointed by GOP presidents ...

The Donald Trump administration is dismissing over 1,350 employees from the State Department as part of a restructuring ...

Just as WPATH's internal emails began trickling into public view, the Supreme Court announced that it would hear Skrmetti. Not long after, Levine's requests to WPATH were reported by The Times.

The Court likewise found no clear directive in section 1319 (a) (2) that any section of the BCL would control where a conflict exists between New York law and foreign substantive law.

The Supreme Court ruling does not strip rights – it clarifies the legal terrain. For employers, the priority should be legal clarity, respectful inclusion and thoughtful leadership.

This article was updated on May 28 at 10:56 a.m. The Trump administration on Tuesday afternoon asked the Supreme Court to pause an order by a federal judge in Massachusetts that prohibits the federal ...

The Supreme Court on Monday cleared the way for the Trump administration to remove hundreds of thousands of Venezuelans from the U.S., ruling 8-1 to throw out a lower court order, while litigation ...

The court’s answer to this question must be a resounding no. Nationwide injunctions were virtually unheard of until the late 20th century.