A RAID 1+0 array requires a minimum of four drives – two mirrored drives to hold half of the striped data, plus another two mirrored for the other half of the data. In Linux, MD RAID 10 is a …

May 7, 2017 · In the case of RAID-01, you need to access all of the remaining drives in the array to rebuild the loss of a single drive. The reason is that you have a RAID-1 across two sets of …

Nov 9, 2010 · Five minutes ago, I was not even aware that RAID 0+1 was an option for 3 disks. So now I have a decision to make. Edit: Raid 0+1 with 3 disks. Glad I am not the only one that …

Note that RAID "10" is not a classical RAID level, it is a nested RAID, and depending on manufacturer implementation it is either RAID 0+1 or RAID 1+0. RAID 5 if you want to …

Nov 16, 2011 · Raid 10 and 01 make no or a lot of difference depending how it is implemented (it must not make any difference, technically). Whether you raid first then stripe or stripe first then …

RAID 01 Good when: never Bad when: always. It is the reverse of RAID 10. It creates two RAID 0 arrays, and then puts a RAID 1 over the top. This means that you can lose one disk from each …

While doing an unattended install of CentOS 7 using kickstart. I set two disks to me mirrored. bootloader --location=mbr --driveorder=sda,sdb zerombr clearpart --all --initlabel # Disk partitio...

That's different than "What advantages to hardware RAID and software RAID have over each other" which is covered in the question that you were linked to – MDMarra Commented Mar 6, …

Jul 28, 2021 · RAID 1 of a pair of drives is easy to do, but only 50% usable space. RAID 6 of a handful of drives will survive 2 failures, very slightly slower due to parity calculations. RAID 10 …

Sep 3, 2013 · And a RAID 5 array with 3 drives for the data partitions. The C: drive ran for the last year with little or no space and last week both drives in the C: Mirrored Array A00-00 failed. I …